Cases 131 - 140 of 3,634
Elmhdati v. Stevens
as 1:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elmhdati
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashley, Tyshown v. Keyes, Warden
as 3:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Tyshown R. Ashley
Respondent:
FCI Warden Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv01119
Petitioner:
Antonio Darnell Mays
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaFaive v. Buesgen
as 2:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Terrence T LaFaive
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, Jovan v. Fox, Eric et al
as 3:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jovan Williams
Defendant:
Eric R. Fox, Rebecca J. Tervonen, Michael C. Dotson and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Komanekin v. Winnebago County
as 2:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
D'Angelo Lee Komanekin
Respondent:
Winnebago County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter, Renardo v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Renardo Liquori Carter
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin and Wood County Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker, Domonique v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Domonique V. Walker
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Werling v. Ball
as 3:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
Nicholas Scott Werling and Lil Sippy
Respondent:
Denita R. Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Linton v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv01180
Petitioner:
Alvin E Linton, III
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
