Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Mendoza v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jose M Mendoza
Defendant:
Tasha Lee and Fran Gull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Fort Wayne Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jose M Mendoza
Defendant:
Fort Wayne Police Department, G Norton and Felton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Attorney General's Offices of the State of Illinois, The, Kimberly Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley, Brandon v. Zahn et al
as 3:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Dep. Zahn, Mental Health Does 1-10, Classification Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv04619
Defendant:
Walsa, Tom Dart, Pullups and others
Plaintiff:
Joelvy Anthony Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Wexford for Profit Corp Source et al
as 1:2018cv01044
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
Wexford for Profit Corp Source, Ida Greenhagen, Doctor Osmundson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv03242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv07326
Plaintiff:
Jason Shelton
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Sandoval, Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv04051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Dart, Cook Cty Sheriff et al
as 1:2016cv06601
Plaintiff:
Rico Mendoza
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook Cty Sheriff and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
