Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Cisco v. Rodrigueze
as 3:2023cv03305
Defendant:
Mare L Rodrigueze and Elizabeth Mare Packard
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Grant Mason
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, S Rodriguez, Daorerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Essex, Jr. v. Galesburg P.D. et al
as 4:2023cv04026
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Essex, Jr
Defendant:
Galesburg P.D., A Rodriguez, . Hardine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Essex, Jr. v. Galesburg P.D. et al
as 1:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Ramsey M. Essex, Jr.
Defendant:
Galesburg P.D., Officer Rodriguez, Officer Hardine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. U.W. Health et al
as 3:2022cv50379
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Rodriguez
Defendant:
U.W. Health and Alyssa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. John H. Stroger Hospital (Cook County Hospital) et al
as 1:2022cv05881
Plaintiff:
Jose Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
John H. Stroger Hospital (Cook County Hospital)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
John Gilliam
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, City Of Chicago, K. Pilch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Ellis
as 2:2021cv02190
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tamera Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv01188
Defendant:
Gabriella Rodriguez, Sgt. Sellers, Lt. Sartain and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
