Cases 31 - 40 of 104
CLIFFORD v. FENTRESS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01425
Defendant:
BRYCE BELLER and FENTRESS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLIFFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cummings v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00785
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cummings
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gordon v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gordon
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lilley v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2017cv06805
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lilley
Defendant:
Lee Schwartz, Kevin Schwartz and Wm. Schwartz & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
ADAMS et al v. WAUPACA FOUNDRY
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS, JARED AHL, ERIC ALDERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
WILLIAM CARWILE, JR.
Defendant:
WAUPACA FOUNDRY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McMillan et al v. Reliable Express Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05161
Plaintiff:
Randy McMillan , Michael Davis , Emiklajd Zeqaj and others
Defendant:
Reliable Express Transport, Inc. , United Delivery Service, Ltd. and John Castaldo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yeung v. Bristo Dragon, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv04741
Plaintiff:
Kei Han Yeung
Defendant:
Bristo Dragon, Inc. and Kevin Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COUCH et al v. METAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BURKS, CHRISTOPHER COUCH, BRANDON TURPEN and others
Defendant:
METAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gaffigan v. Sugar Factory Rosemont, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04494
Plaintiff:
Ashley Gaffigan
Defendant:
Sugar Factory Rosemont, LLC and Kevin Killerman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ali et al v. Vehi-Ship, LLC
as 1:2017cv02688
Plaintiff:
Rashida Ali , Niquela Cole , Kevin Collins and others
Defendant:
Vehi-Ship, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
