Cases 11 - 20 of 190
Bland v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv50144
Plaintiff:
Erin K. Bland
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brookins II v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Brian K Brookins II
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JOHNSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02066
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH K. JOHNSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Owens v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv50363
Plaintiff:
Brett K Owens
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RADFORD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01946
Plaintiff:
RHONDA K RADFORD and RHONDA K. RADFORD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dial v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Dial
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Shaun K. Mann
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BOATMAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
DE CHARLA K. BOATMAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ostrum v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02228
Plaintiff:
Emma K Ostrum
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Diana K. Gore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
