Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,662
MINGS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff: REBECCA J. MINGS and REBECCA JANE MINGS
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DEWITT v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: MARGARET MARIE DEWITT
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ENGLAND v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff: WILLIAM A.D. ENGLAND
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bowker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: Jenifer L. Bowker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GEORGE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff: CEANN RAE GEORGE
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Albaugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Michelle M. Albaugh
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SPARKMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: ERIC R. SPARKMAN
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff: Doris Hall
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: THOMAS MILLER
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KENNEDY et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff: TYLER JOSEPH KENNEDY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?