Cases 71 - 80 of 3,679
THOMASON-YOCUM v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY J. THOMASON-YOCUM
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PITTMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. PITTMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PATTISON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
SARAH G. PATTISON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
KING v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
KAIYA J. KING
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
KOUBA v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
JACLYN M. KOUBA
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HAWTHORN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
BONES M. HAWTHORN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Esters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Esters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
DEATON v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY SHANDAIL DEATON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ENRIGHT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE ENRIGHT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Isajczuk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Adrian Jan Isajczuk
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
