Cases 71 - 80 of 103
PALOMO v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01544
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
RICARDO PALOMO
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STARKS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01530
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ANDRE STARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MUMFORD v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01483
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MUMFORD
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JARVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01426
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
BRENT A. JARVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JARVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01373
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
CELIA JARVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BOOKER v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BOOKER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BLOXSOM v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01258
Plaintiff:
BETH BLOXSOM
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FELDHAKE v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01259
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
JOHN I. FELDHAKE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WEST v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01187
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN K. WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KLEIMAN v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01188
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
KATHY ANNE KLEIMAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
