Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Panozzo v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 2:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Glenn Panozzo
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simms v. Simply Fashion Stores Ltd.
as 1:2014cv00737
Defendant:
EXACTTARGET, INC. and SIMPLY FASHION STORES LTD.
Plaintiff:
LATONYA SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MILLER v. JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00474
Defendant:
DENOVUS CORPORATION LTD, LLC and JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC
Plaintiff:
SHELDREA GENELL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COOK v. JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
FRANCES COOK
Defendant:
FIRSEL LAW GROUP, LTD. and JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AKINS v. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
as 1:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
CANDY AKINS
Defendant:
HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AKINS v. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
as 1:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
CANDY AKINS
Defendant:
HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AKINS v. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
as 1:2012cv00853
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AKINS
Defendant:
HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RYDEN v. TOMBERLIN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP et al
as 1:2011cv01215
Defendant:
AMERICAN KENDRA RUBBER INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD and TOMBERLIN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
Plaintiff:
TODD RYDEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
PARTON v. MERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00291
Defendant:
MERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, LLC and RIVERWALK HOLDINGS, LTD.
Plaintiff:
PHILIP K. PARTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BELL v. HARRS & HARRIS, LTD.
as 1:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA M. BELL
Defendant:
HARRS & HARRIS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
