Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Pililimis v. Yancey, Murphy & Associates et al
as 1:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Yancey, Murphy & Associates and Phillip C. Owens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owens v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2012cv08844
Plaintiff:
John Owens
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Owens v. City of Chicago
as 1:2012cv07928
Plaintiff:
John Owens
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cannarozzi et al v. MSW Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02537
Plaintiff:
Annie Cannarozzi and Dawna Owen
Defendant:
MSW Capital, LLC and Praxis Financial Solutions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HALL v. OWEN COUNTY STATE BANK
as 1:2011cv01303
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HALL
Defendant:
OWEN COUNTY STATE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Engelmann et al v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2010cv08232
Plaintiff:
Carol Engelmann , Dempsey Owens , Mildred Calender and others
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Owens v. Barker
as 1:2009cv06789
Plaintiff:
Gary E Owens
Defendant:
Danny Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
washington v. Owens et al
as 1:2009cv05207
Plaintiff:
peggy washington
Defendant:
Monique Owens and Steinberg, Owens, & Stern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owner-Operator Independent Dri, et al v. Mayflower Transit
as 08-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM H. OWEN, TIMOTHY CORWIN, SR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, INCORPORATED
Owner-Operator Independent Dri, et al v. Mayflower Transit
as 08-1300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM H. OWEN, TIMOTHY CORWIN, SR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
