Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Medina v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2020cv07043
Defendant:
Takita Brown and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Medina Guadalupe and Guadalupe Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osborne v. Village of Plainfield, Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv03654
Petitioner:
Frederick Osborne
Respondent:
Village of Plainfield, Illinois, United States Postal Service, Det. Sgt. Kevin Mcquaid of the Plainfield, Illinois Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Espada, Sr. v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv06539
Defendant:
Ontario Hopson and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Espada, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Walker v. Hopson
as 1:2018cv06543
Defendant:
Ontario Hopson and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Ahmin Walker and Ahmin Zaid Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hollins v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv05611
Plaintiff:
Kamaya Hollins
Defendant:
Maxine King and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Speedy Check Cashers, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2017cv01489
Plaintiff:
Speedy Check Cashers, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Karch v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jack Bruce Karch
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Tyus v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv01467
Plaintiff:
Rondo Tyus
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Direct Auto Insurance Company, a corporation v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv09107
Plaintiff:
Direct Auto Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Raymond Milota, Jr. v. USPS
as 15-2969
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND R. MILOTA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
