Cases 41 - 50 of 56
JONES et al v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01274
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHATTERTON and NICOLE JONES
Defendant:
WILLIAM COLOMBO, JAY CROSSON, DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
SHEPHERD v. VENGROFF, WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2010cv00808
Plaintiff:
LISA SHEPHERD
Defendant:
VENGROFF, WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dillard v. PRS Assets LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Jason Dillard
Defendant:
PRS Assets LLC and William R Richards PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fausset et al v. Mortgage First LLC
as 4:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mike Fausset and Todd Williams
Defendant:
Mortgage First LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly v. Stuart Allen & Associates Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
David J Kelly
Defendant:
Stuart Allen & Associates Inc, Jay Probasco and Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CRANE et al v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C.
as 1:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. CRANE and WILLIAM D. CRANE, III
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scanlin v. Professional Recovery Service
as 3:2008cv00351
Plaintiff:
William E Scanlin
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Serles et al v. Allied Interstate Inc
as 2:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
William K Serles and William I Serles, Jr
Defendant:
Allied Interstate Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Serles et al v. National Action Financial Services Inc
as 2:2008cv00249
Plaintiff:
William K Serles and William I Serles, Jr
Defendant:
National Action Financial Services Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALTON et al v. HYATT & ROSENBAUM, P.A. et al
as 1:2008cv01275
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WALTON and MARGARET WALTON
Defendant:
HYATT & ROSENBAUM, P.A., STEPHEN HYATT and WILLIAM T. ROSENBAUM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
