Cases 11 - 20 of 46
ACUITY v. Bill's Complete Landscape, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06571
Plaintiff:
ACUITY
Defendant:
Bill's Complete Landscape, Inc., William Szydlowski and Luis Roman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
as 1:2017cv01415
Defendant:
HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ruiz et al v. Pekin Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lionel A Ruiz, Sr. and Roman D Ruiz
Defendant:
Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Costello v. Roman Brunner
as 14-3568
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN W. COSTELLO, not individually, but as Litigation Trustee under the Comdisco Litigation Trust
Defendant - Appellant:
ROMAN BRUNNER
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Patterson et al
as 1:2014cv08800
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hallee Kale Patterson, Scott Kale, Roman Janicki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Costello v. Roman Brunner
as 14-3399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. COSTELLO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMAN BRUNNER
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
as 1:2014cv01734
Defendant:
HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NOBLE ROMANS, INC. v. RUBICON DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01205
Defendant:
LEE JESTINGS and RUBICON DEVELOPMENT LLC
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
NOBLE ROMANS, INC. v. MMARTIN AND BAYLEY, INC.
as 1:2014cv01088
Defendant:
MARTIN AND BAYLEY, INC.
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NOBLE ROMANS, INC. v. GULBANI
as 1:2014cv01068
Defendant:
NARAIN GULBANI
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
