Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Gaertner v. Tesmond et al
as 1:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Eugene Gaertner, Eugene Gaertner, Eugene Gaertner and others
Defendant:
Anthony Tesmond, Gaertner and Associates, S.C. and Addison Medical Center Defined Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Carr et al
as 1:2009cv05391
Plaintiff:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Andrew W Carr, Community Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation P.C., Coast Capital Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
National City Healthcare Finance et al v. Refine 360, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv07242
Plaintiff:
National City Healthcare Finance, National City Healthcare Finance, National City Commercial Capital Corporation and others
Defendant:
Refine 360, LLC, Plastic Surgeons Associated, S.C. and Talmage J. Raine
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lane v. Great Lakes Anesthesia P.C. et al
as 1:2008cv00652
Plaintiff:
Philip E Lane
Defendant:
Great Lakes Anesthesia P.C., University Anesthesiologists S.C and Chicago Anesthesia Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Selective Insurance Company of S.C. v. H.G. Vegter Excavating Co. et al
as 1:2007cv05331
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of S.C. and Selective Insurance Company of S.C.
Defendant:
H.G. Vegter Excavating Co., City of Harvey and Harvey Park District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. S.C. NESTEL, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00470
Plaintiff:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Defendant:
S.C. NESTEL, INC., S.C. NESTEL, INC., OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Counter Claimant:
S.C. NESTEL, INC., S.C. NESTEL, INC., OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Counter Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
