Cases 1 - 7 of 7
G. & S. Management Corporation d/b/a Autoserv of Tilton v. Cars.com, Inc.
as 1:2017cv08708
Plaintiff:
G. & S. Management Corporation d/b/a Autoserv of Tilton
Defendant:
Cars.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R3 Composites Corporation v. G&S Sales Corp.
as 1:2016cv00387
Plaintiff:
R3 Composites Corporation
Defendant:
G&S Sales Corp.
Counter_claimant:
G&S Sales Corp.
Counter_defendant:
R3 Composites Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
G&S Foundry & MFG.Co Inc v. Midwest Motorcycle Supply Distributors Corp
as 3:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
G&S Foundry & MFG.Co Inc
Defendant:
Midwest Motorcycle Supply Distributors Corp
Counter_claimant:
Midwest Motorcycle Supply Distributors Corp
Counter_defendant:
G&S Foundry & MFG.Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
G & S Holdings LLC, et al v. Continental Casualty Company, et al
as 11-1813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G & S HOLDINGS LLC, G & S METAL TRADING LLC, ALUMINUM SIZING INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and HYLANT GROUP INCORPORATED
G&S Holdings LLC et al v. Continental Casualty Company et al
as 3:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
G&S Holdings LLC, G&S Holdings LLC, G&S Metal Trading LLC and others
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company, Continental Casualty Company and Hylant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Global Scrap Management, Inc. v. G&S Metal Consultants, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00594
Plaintiff:
Global Scrap Management, Inc. and Global Scrap Management, Inc.
Defendant:
G&S Metal Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Middleby Marshall Inc. vs. Pizza Equipment Supply, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
Middleby Marshall Inc., Middleby Marshall Inc., Middleby Marshall Inc. and others
Defendant:
Pizza Equipment Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
