Cases 91 - 100 of 9,165
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Keaton Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PERRY v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA MARIE PERRY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BOISVERT v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOISVERT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
English v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael L. English
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DEVINE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MINGS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. MINGS and REBECCA JANE MINGS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Albert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Danielle E Albert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KELLEY M. BEAUCHAMP v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
KELLEY M BEAUCHAMP
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Likes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maria A. Likes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
