Cases 11 - 20 of 705
Kate Vanover v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KATE E. VANOVER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jessica E. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Touhey v. Social Security
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Chase E. Touhey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Worstell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bron E. Worstell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tonya Trzebny v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
TONYA E. TRZEBNY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
SELBY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. SELBY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Skinner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv04232
Plaintiff:
Robert E Skinner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Taylor v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv50452
Plaintiff:
Pamela E. Taylor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hatton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Jennifer E. Hatton, Jennifer Hatton and Hatton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Medina v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv16891
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Medina
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
