Cases 31 - 40 of 9,126
Ott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Carly L Ott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KNIGHT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN A. KNIGHT
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Paschal v Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
AARON PASCHAL
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shilts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
LORI ANNE SHILTS
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DEKEN v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
THOMAS R. DEKEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARDEN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. HARDEN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Keaton Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BOISVERT v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOISVERT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
English v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael L. English
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
