Cases 61 - 70 of 24,539
Birk v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Victor Birk
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adamski, Jared v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Adamski
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
BRANDON K. JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Toolooze v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04046
Plaintiff:
Aaron Toolooze
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reef v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Reef
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hargrove, ex rel. T.H. et al vs O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03790
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hargrove, ex rel. T.H., a minor
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Seiber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jamie L Seiber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
PRATER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE S. PRATER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
DICKERSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. DICKERSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
