Cases 1 - 10 of 9,178
FAUVERGUE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
NANCY J. FAUVERGUE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MOSLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J. MOSLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gearheart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Andrea N. Gearheart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
MAHURIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
PAUL M. MAHURIN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Snyder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stegall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Millard D Stegall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blink v. Social Security
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Blink
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reece v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY REECE
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kaplan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Russell A Kaplan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fack v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Brenda S. Fack
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
