Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Vortes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Vortes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Alvarez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv04668
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Alvarez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Merrell v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv50446
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Merrell
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woods v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv05036
Plaintiff:
Rosemary J. Woods
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Larocca v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02662
Defendant:
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Rosemary A Larocca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Merrell v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv50363
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Merrell
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TOLLE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01442
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY TOLLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FINNEY v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv02260
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE FINNEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00023
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Hughes
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
