Cases 1 - 10 of 118
McCuan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. McCuan
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morris v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Angela H. Morris
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Boards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02198
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
William H. Boards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shah v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06275
Plaintiff:
Chirag H. Shah
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gabel v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv06156
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John H Gabel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ferida Moy v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1461
Plaintiff:
FERIDA H. MOY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Reedy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
LaShonda H Reedy
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rosetto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00056
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Joseph H. Rosetto and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ernest H Sanders
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Horstman v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv17091
Plaintiff:
Terrence H. Horstman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
