Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 5074 Royal. T. Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04176
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
5074 Royal. T. Inc. and Nedzad Music
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdul-Salaam v. AT&T Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Shelleen Abdul-Salaam
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bressert v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 1:2012cv03984
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bressert
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC , AT&T Inc. and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Music et al
as 1:2012cv02426
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Nedzad Music and 5074 Royal T. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. 5074 Royal T., Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04277
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
5074 Royal T., Inc. and Nedzad Music
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Srivastava v. Payne et al
as 2:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant:
James Payne , Mitchell Daniels , Randall Shepard and others
Viasystems Technologies Corporation LLC v. Landstar Ranger Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
Viasystems Technologies Corporation LLC
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger Inc, JT&T Inc and ABC Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hickel v. Network Connections USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2009cv07907
Defendant:
Network Connections USA, Inc. and AT&T, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Hickel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Case name not on file
as 1:2009cv03798
Movant:
SBC Communications Inc. (n/k/a AT&T Inc.) and SBC Telephone Concession Plan
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kaelin v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 1:2009cv01393
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Kaelin, Donna M. Kaelin and Donna M. Kaelin
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
