Other Statutes Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00189
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00365
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Beatty v. Noland
as 1:2013cv08813
Plaintiff: James Beatty
Defendant: William Noland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
IMO 2013 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2013mc00060
Respondent: Anne M Schueler-Hickey, Tanya Renee Bell, Christina Johnston Cloutier and others
In Re: Failure to Comply With Continuing Legal Education Requrements, Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees, and/or Failure to Submit IOLTA Certification re Indiana Supreme Court Order of May 30, 2013
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012mc00062
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ronnie Gene Wilson and Atlantic Bullion & Coin Inc
Receiver: Beattie Ashmore
United States of America v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012mc00025
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ronnie Gene Wilson and Atlantic Bullion & Coin Inc
Receiver: Beattie B Ashmore
IN RE: RECEIVER
as 1:2011mc00007
Receiver: BEATTIE B. ASHMORE
In Re: RECEIVER
Michael Dyke v. NLRB
as 10-2538
Petitioner: MICHAEL DYKE, SANDRA KENDALL, DOUGLAS AMONETT and others
Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
HOLDER v. LANDMAN & BEATTY, LAWYERS, LLP
as 1:2009cv00680
Plaintiff: SHEILA HOLDER, SHEILA HOLDER and SHEILA HOLDER
Defendant: LANDMAN & BEATTY, LAWYERS, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?