Cases 11 - 20 of 1,737
FTC v. Margaret Cumming
as 24-1288
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MARGARET E. CUMMING, in her capacity as personal representative of the Estate of David T. Cumming
FTC v. Margaret Cumming
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MARGARET E. CUMMING, in her capacity as personal representative of the Estate of David T. Cumming
Baez, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Decendant David James Baez and Pro Hac Vice Raymond Frank Baez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Child Support and The People Of The State of California
Claimant:
SPECIAL COUNSEL Raymond Frank Baez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hang et al v. Halloin et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mailee Hang, Tou Vang Hang, Mailee Hang Estate and Trust and others
Defendant:
Scott R Halloin, Sheila L Shadman Emerson, Molly S Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kraemer v. USHealth Advisors, LLC
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
David Kraemer
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dennis Merritt v. Joseph Grady, et al
as 24-8002
Petitioner:
DENNIS R. MERRITT
Respondent:
JOSEPH GRADY, Judge, BRADLEY DAVID, Judge, CLINT HULL, Chief Judge and others
Morgan et al v. Rosebud Lending LZO et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Joseph Morgan and David Johnson
Defendant:
Rosebud Lending LZO doing business as ZocaLoans, 777 Partners, LLC, F3EA Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. David Sargent
as 24-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SARGENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
