Cases 11 - 20 of 317
Rogers v. Super Ego Holdings LLC
as 1:2023cv02272
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Rogers
Defendant:
Super Ego Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lippman v. Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ilene Lippman
Defendant:
Robert B Ford, Robert J. Alpern, Sally E. Blount and others
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. White et al
as 1:2022cv07045
Plaintiff:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Bruce Adelman in his official capacity as a member of the Illinois Motor Vehicle Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
USA v. Roger Catron
as 22-3199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER D. CATRON
Daniels v. Santos et al
as 1:2022cv06571
Plaintiff:
Tamara C Daniels
Defendant:
Robert L Santos, Marilyn A Sanders, Willie Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
USA v. Claude Rogers
as 22-2705
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLAUDE T. ROGERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fedorova v. Bank of America, N. A. et al
as 1:2022cv03486
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova
Defendant:
Bank of America, N. A., Brian Moynihan, Discover and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
