Cases 11 - 20 of 209
USA v. Jerry Walker
as 23-1424
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY WALKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barnett et al v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Caleb Barnett, Brian Norman, Hoods Guns & More and others
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Brendan F. Kelly, James Gomric and others
Amicus Curiae:
Illinois Sheriffs Association, Everytown for Gun Safety and Second Amendment Law Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Henry v. Coughlan et al
as 3:2022cv03239
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Coughlan, Timothy C. Evans, Judge Sophia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkinson et al v. Super Ego Holding, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04127
Plaintiff:
Larry Atkinson, Eugene Walker, Jason Greene and others
Defendant:
Super Ego Holding, LLC, Floyd, Inc., Kordun Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
RANKIN v. OPICHI, LLC d/b/a EVERGREEN SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv01537
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RANKIN
Defendant:
OPICHI, LLC d/b/a EVERGREEN SERVICES, LDF HOLDINGS, LLC, MELINDA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KNOTTS v. BIBOON, LLC doing business as BRIDGE LENDING SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01370
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Knotts
Defendant:
Biboon, LLC d/b/a Bridge Lending Solutions, LDF Holdings, LLC, Melinda Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Gregg Scott
as 22-1356
Applicant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Respondent:
GREGG SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
