Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Tiberius Mays v. Vipin Shah, et al
as 20-1820
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN RITZ, PHILIP MARTIN, RYAN ERICKSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIBERIUS MAYS
Anthony Mays, et al v. Thomas Dart
as 20-1792
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff, Cook County, Illinois
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUDIA JACKSON, as next friend of KENNETH FOSTER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, and ANTHONY MAYS, Individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons
Chris Logan v. City of Chicago, et al
as 20-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MAY, individually, DAVID SCHMIDT, individually, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Robert Johnson v. Paul May, et al
as 20-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, ALICIA INGRAM, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Insurance Fraud Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Chadd Morris v. Jerry Worley, et al
as 19-3209
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYANT MAYS, KEITH ROSE, MITCH KESSLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADD A. MORRIS
Sidney Peterson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 19-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LOREATHA COLEMAN, ARTHUR DAVIDA, SARAH MAYS and others
Marva Mack v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-2227
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MAY, CESAR PINTO and CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVA MACK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00989
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clarisha Benson, et al v. Fannie May Confections Brands,
as 19-1032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARISHA BENSON and LORENZO SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
FANNIE MAY CONFECTIONS BRANDS, INC., an Illinois corporation
MAI v. I.C. SYSTEM, INC.
as 1:2018cv03817
Defendant:
I.C. SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHIEN MAI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
