Cases 21 - 30 of 309
USA v. Carolyn Anderson
as 23-2278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAROLYN ANDERSON
DeAndre Slate v. Makes Cents, Inc., et al
as 23-2232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEANDRE SLATE, on behalf of Plaintiff and the class members described below
Defendant / Appellant:
MAKES CENTS, INC., doing business as MAXLEND, UETSA TSAKITS, INC., CANE BAY PARTNERS VI, LLLP and others
Rojas v. Gold Standard Media, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02622
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Gold Standard Media, LLC, Top Source Media, LLC, David Fishchuk and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. James Anderson
as 23-1375
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ANDERSON
Slate v. Makes Cents, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Slate
Defendant:
Makes Cents, Inc., doing business as MaxLend, Uetsa Tsakits, Inc., David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lindenberger, Deborah v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP et al
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lindenberger
Defendant:
Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP, Kirk Chewning, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LEMMONS v. MAKES CENTS, INC. d/b/a MAXLEND et al
as 1:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Lindzy Lemmons
Defendant:
Makes Cents, Inc., dba MaxLend, Uetsa Tsakits, Inc., David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv03750
Plaintiff:
Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
Steven T Murphy, Quentin Tanner, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
