Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Lawrence Adamczyk v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 22-1319
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE E. ADAMCZYK
Respondent:
ROB JEFFREYS, Director of IDOC, GREG MORGENTHALER, Warden of BMRCC and KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of Illinois
McHenry County, et al v. Kwame Raoul
as 21-3334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS and KANKAKEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
KWAME RAOUL, in his official capacity as Illinois Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Henry v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv03244
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
United States of America, Village of Orland Park, Klein Thorpe & Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
McHenry County et al v. Raoul
as 3:2021cv50341
Plaintiff:
McHenry County and Kankakee County
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute and National Immigrant Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Michael Bargo, Jr. v. J. B. Pritzker, et al
as 21-2578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BARGO, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
J.B. PRITZKER, MICHAEL J. MADIGAN, KWAME RAOUL and others
Meyer et al v. Raoul et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYER, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION and others
Defendant:
KWAME RAOUL, BRENDAN KELLY, DWIGHT A. BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bargo v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2021cv03117
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, John Jay Pritzker, Don Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Bargo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huguette Young v. Kwame Raoul
as 21-1109
Defendant / Appellee:
KWAME RAOUL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG
Rebecca Minick v. Michael Williams, et al
as 21-1075
Petitioner / Appellant:
REBECCA MINICK
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS, CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, CHAMPAIGN COUNTY and KWAME RAOUL
Young v. Raoul
as 3:2020cv03266
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
