Cases 21 - 30 of 40
IMO 2014 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2014mc00062
Respondent:
Sara Elizabeth Corbat, Danel Michelle Nickels, Duane Jonathan Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
LEWIS v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00573
Defendant:
DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC, DPH-DAS LLC, GENERAL MOTORS HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEWIS
as 1:2012mc00107
Respondent:
MICHELLE A. LEWIS
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
ALLMAN et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
ROBIN ALLMAN, MARGARET BAUGHER, MARK BAUGHER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON and KEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
