Cases 21 - 30 of 31
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
RAY et al v. WELLPOINT INC.
as 1:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
TRENT KELSO and RYAN RAY
Defendant:
WELLPOINT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Messmer v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 1:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Trent Messmer
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Trent Forte
as 13-1030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TRENT FORTE
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
UTT v. DISHMAN et al
as 1:2008cv01308
Plaintiff:
HUBER UTT
Defendant:
JOSEPH TRENT DISHMAN, KATINA DISHMAN, JAMES BRANDON DISHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henry v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2007cv04814
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
United States Of America, Internal Revenue Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
