Cases 31 - 40 of 351
Prince et al v. Attorney General of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv05659
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Prince, Angel Prince, Earl Prince, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Attorney General of Illinois, City of Chicago, Calahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowes-Northern v. Village of Phoenix et al
as 1:2021cv06595
Plaintiff:
Cathy Bowes and Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Village of Phoenix, Village of Dolton, Echo Joint Agreement and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Amanda Bergquist v. Donald Milazzo, et al
as 21-2897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA JANE BERGQUIST
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD MILAZZO, JENNIFER LARSON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Gerald Hacker v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 21-2910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD HACKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, SABRINA RIVERO-CANCHOLA, THOMAS J. DART and others
Larry Tate v. Thomas J. Dart, et al
as 21-2752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY TATE
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, MATTHEW BURKE, REBECCA REIERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dionte Young v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 21-2715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIONTE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
County of Cook, et al v. T. S., et al
as 21-8032
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF COOK and LEONARD DIXON
Respondent:
T. S. and Q. B.
Chet Smith v. John Doe, et al
as 21-2767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHET SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Sergeant, JOHN DOE, Transfer Correctional Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PATRICK and others
Tina Turner v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-2599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and KIMBERLY M. FOXX, Cook County State Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
