Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 1:2016mc01008
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Julie Warkins , Dan Williams and others
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 3:2016mc00043
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYS v. CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2016cv01151
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ADDISON LAMONT MAYS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Lavender v. UIC College of Denistry et al
as 1:2016cv01996
Plaintiff:
Doris Queen Lavender
Defendant:
UIC College of Denistry, D. Robinson, Johnnie May Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv01934
Defendant:
United States of America , Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Thomas E. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED v. STEPHAN, et al
as 1:2015cv01832
Defendant:
JIM HUSTON, CAROLINE R. MAYS-MEDLEY, SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Floyd May v. John Darrah
as 15-3437
Petitioner:
FLOYD MAY
Respondent:
JOHN W. DARRAH
Party-in-Interest:
SYLVIA MAHONE and IMHOTEP CARTER, Doctor
Rauxa Direct, LLC v. Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. et al
as 1:2015cv04964
Defendant:
Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. , Norman Jones , Gary J. Stern and others
Plaintiff:
Rauxa Direct, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holland et al v. The City of Gary et al
as 2:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland and The Law Firm of Robert Holland
Defendant:
The City of Gary , Rudy Clay , Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Berton May
as 15-2152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BERTON MAYS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
