Other Statutes Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 165
USA v. Tom Lewis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1911
Defendant / Appellant: TOM LEWIS
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tom Tuduj v. Steven Newbold, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant: TOM TUDUJ
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN R. BALDWIN, in his capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, STEVEN M. NEWBOLD, Doctor, Dental Director, GEORGE HENDERSON, DDS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv50075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Loughnane v. Zukowski Rogers Flood & McArdle et al
as 1:2019cv00086
Defendant: Richard G Flood, Michael J Smoron, Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP and others
Plaintiff: David Loughnane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv50414
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07227
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Tom Smith, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2905
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TOM SMITH, III, also known as THOMAS SMITH, III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv50250
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv50249
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?