Cases 51 - 60 of 66
USA v. One red Sanyo camera flip cellphone
as 3:2011mc00023
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
One red Sanyo camera flip cellphone
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Cohen et al
as 3:2011cv50228
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Cohen, David B. Cook and Red Light District IL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
People's United Equipment Finance Corp. v. Red Star Trucking Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv02602
Plaintiff:
People's United Equipment Finance Corp.
Defendant:
Red Star Trucking Inc., Milly Express Inc. and Sanja Rankovic
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
USA et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
USA , State of Illinois , State of California and others
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc. , Marion Hospital Corporation , CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
RM Yogurt Hawaii, LLC v. Red Mnago Franchise Company, now knowns as Red Mango FC, LLC, et al.
as 1:2011cv01631
Plaintiff:
RM Yogurt Hawaii, LLC
Defendant:
Red Mnago Franchise Company, now knowns as Red Mango FC, LLC, et al.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
United States of America v. One Red/Silver LG Sprint Cellular Telephone
as 1:2010mc00301
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Red/Silver LG Sprint Cellular Telephone
RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. BUNCH et al
as 1:2009mc00096
Plaintiff:
RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN D. BUNCH, II and NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
USA v. Vernon Rollins
as 09-2259
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VERNON ROLLINS, also known as RED
United States of America v. A Red Semi-truck Cab, North Carolina registration number LM7519
as 1:2009mc00197
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A Red Semi-truck Cab, North Carolina registration number LM7519
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
