Cases 51 - 60 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TRAHAN v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP INC., ET AL
as 1:2016cv03161
Defendant:
DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KARL TRAHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
FISCHER v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02666
Defendant:
DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, EDWARD L. HAMBURG and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
EXTRUSION MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT, INC. v. AMERIFORM ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2016mc00001
Defendant:
AMERIFORM ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
EXTRUSION MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT, INC.
Third Party Defendant:
DONALD KRUSCHKE and PLASTICS MACHINERY GROUP, INC.
Interested Party:
UWAY EXTRUSION LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
