Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Darrell Hughes v. USPS
as 13-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL W. HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Gregg Moore v. USPS, et al
as 12-3667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGG MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DEBRA LEWIS, United States Postal Service Wicker Park Retail, OFFICER GRAFFEO, #3185 and others
Martin v. Montfort et al
as 1:2012cv09178
Plaintiff:
Tia Martin
Defendant:
Kevin Montfort
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Moore v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2012cv06315
Defendant:
United States Postal Service , Debra Lewis , Graffeo and others
Plaintiff:
Gregg Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Brooks v. Stehlik
as 1:2011cv05554
Plaintiff:
Constance Brooks
Defendant:
Milos Stehlik
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Milos Stehlik
Third_party_defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
THAYER-BALLINGER v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
PAMELA THAYER-BALLINGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Speedy Check Cashers, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2011cv03255
Plaintiff:
Speedy Check Cashers, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jokinen, John v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2010mc00026
Plaintiff:
John A. Jokinen
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Thompson v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2009cv03418
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Thompson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Carrizales v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2009cv02080
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Carrizales
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
