Cases 61 - 70 of 2,829
Camp Drug Store, Inc. et al v. North Coast Medical Supply et al
as 3:2023cv03955
Plaintiff:
Camp Drug Store, Inc. and KEVIN LEE HENDRICK
Defendant:
NORTH COAST MEDICAL SUPPLY, NORTH COAST MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC d/b/a ADVANCED DIABETES SUPPLY and North Coast Medical Supply, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Advanced Diabetes Supply
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Earl Miller
as 23-3324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EARL D. MILLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
USA v. Eddie D. Sims
as 23-3292
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDDIE D. SIMS
USA v. James Williams
as 23-3284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES D. WILLIAMS
USA v. Jermel Ware
as 23-3276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERMEL D. WARE
USA v. Orlando D. Farley
as 23-3270
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ORLANDO D. FARLEY
HENDERSON v. DISCOUNT AUTO SALES LLC et al.
as 1:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENDERSON
Defendant:
DISCOUNT AUTO SALES LLC, DISCOUNT AUTO SALES LLC and/or any unknown business entity d/b/a DISCOUNT AUTO SALES and INDIANAPOLIS CAR EXCHANGE, INC. and/or any unknown business entity d/b/a INDIANAPOLIS CAR EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
