Cases 71 - 80 of 133
Larry Latham v. William Wolfe, et al
as 15-2855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY EUGENE LATHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM WOLFE, Doctor, Dr.-Motion for S/J granted 6/16/2015, ROSE VAISVILAS and MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Dr.-Motion for S/J granted 6/16/2015
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States Department of Agriculture v. Grant
as 1:2014mc01067
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Agriculture
Defendant:
Tiarra Grant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Caribbean Cruise Line, Incorpo, et al v. Grant Birchmeier, et al
as 14-8021
Petitioner:
CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINE, INCORPORATED and VACATION OWNERSHIP MARKETING TOURS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
GRANT BIRCHMEIER, STEPHEN PARKES and REGINA STONE, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grant Bentrud v. Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & Vicia
as 14-2384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRANT E. BENTRUD
Defendant - Appellee:
BOWMAN, HEINTZ, BOSCIA & VICIAN, P.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00711
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
