Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jason Palermo, et al v. Larry Schaedel
as 23-3042
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON PALERMO, as owner of the vessel BETTER TIMES II, a 1999 Sea Ray 500 Sundancer, IL 0587KX, in rem and WESLEY MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
LARRY SCHAEDEL, as independent administrator of the ESTATE OF LANE G. SCHAEDEL, deceased,
Frazier Industrial Company v. PPT Industrial Machines, LLC d/b/a Pacific Press Technologies et al
as 1:2023cv13380
Plaintiff:
Frazier Industrial Company
Defendant:
PPT Industrial Machines, LLC d/b/a Pacific Press Technologies and Right Lane Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
USA v. Mark Lane
as 23-1959
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK ALAN LANE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Deighan Law LLC, et al v. J. Gilbert
as 22-2083
Petitioner:
DEIGHAN LAW LLC, doing business as UpRight Law LLC and JAMES E. FORD
Respondent:
J. PHIL GILBERT
Interested Party:
NANCY J. GARGULA, BOYCE ALLEN BURNS, Debtor and AMANDA LANE BURNS, Debtor
McGee v. Sugars et al
as 1:2022cv03027
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lane McGee
Defendant:
D. Sugars, Cater and Kyle Sommers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lavonte Lane v. Thomas J. Dart, et al
as 21-3226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVONTE LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, E. GUERECA, S. TAYLOR and others
David Lane, Jr. v. Michael Person
as 21-2710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID H. LANE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PERSON, Doctor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
