Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sharon Brown v. Polk County, Wisconsin, et al
as 19-2698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON LYNN BROWN, nee Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN HILLESHIEM, WES REVELS, JANET LEE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Jaytaiz Polk
as 17-1281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAYTAIZ POLK
Holmes v. Brennan et al
as 1:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Holmes
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan and Michelle D. Giles-Polks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILLENWARTH DENNERLINE GROTH & TOWE, LLP v. MULLETT et al
as 1:2016cv00468
Cross Claimant:
CITIZENS ACTION COALITION OF INDIANA, INC. and LORCH NAVILLE WARD LLC
Cross Defendant:
CITIZENS ACTION COALITION OF INDIANA, INC., LORCH NAVILLE WARD LLC, LORCH NAVILLE WARD LLC and others
Defendant:
CITIZENS ACTION COALITION OF INDIANA, INC., LORCH NAVILLE WARD LLC, MICHAEL A MULLETT and others
Plaintiff:
FILLENWARTH DENNERLINE GROTH & TOWE, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Polk v. Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05332
Plaintiff:
Listeen Polk
Defendant:
Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Type:
Other Statutes
Bautista v. Freedman Anselmo Lindberg LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03962
Plaintiff:
Laura K. Bautista
Defendant:
Freedman Anselmo Lindberg LLC and Michael R. Polk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith-Howard et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05198
Plaintiff:
Vaughanzella Smith-Howard, Vaughanzella Smith-Howard, Rita Polk and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
