Cases 1 - 10 of 229
GAINES v. T-MOBILE et al
as 1:2024cv01552
Defendant:
ANDY MOHR CAR DEALERSHIP, IN ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT., HUNNIGTON BANK and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS B. GAINES
Cross-Defendant:
1,000 MILES AWAY DIGITAL SCIENTORS WITH THE DIGITAL MANIPULATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nasim v. Embassy of the United States, Islamabad et al
as 1:2024cv05868
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Anthony Blinken, Embassy of the United States, Islamabad and others
Plaintiff:
Danish Nasim
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tan v. TRUSTGHQ et al
as 1:2024cv05189
Defendant:
DApps Platform, Inc., Binance Holdings Ltd., TRUSTGHQ and others
Plaintiff:
TAYFUN TAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simmons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Stevenson
as 1:2024cv02778
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Nathaniel Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jordan Watkins v. Brij Mohan, et al
as 24-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIJ MOHAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keith Chiaro, et al v. Methodist Hospitals, Inc.
as 23-3385
Plaintiff:
KEITH CHIARO and JANE DOE
Defendant:
METHODIST HOSPITALS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jane Doe v. University of Chicago, et al
as 23-3070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, SAUL LEVMORE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
