Cases 1 - 10 of 41
USA v. Roberto Bustos-Jimenez
as 23-2763
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO BUSTOS-JIMENEZ
USA v. Roberto Bustos-Jimenez
as 23-2769
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO BUSTOS-JIMENEZ
USA v. Juan Jimenez
as 23-2462
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN JIMENEZ, also known as Chinks; also known as China Man; also known as Beast
Jimenez v. American Para Professional Systems, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05244
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez
Defendant:
American Para Professional Systems, Inc. doing business as APPS Para Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jimenez v. Social Firestarter LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03834
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez
Defendant:
Social Firestarter LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jimenez v. Vitalant et al
as 1:2022cv03331
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez
Defendant:
Vitalant and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clarity Clinic, LLC v. Jimenez et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Clarity Clinic, LLC, an Illinois corporation and Clarity Clinic, LLC
Defendant:
Samira Jimenez, individual, Bright Haven Behavioral Health Center, Ltd., an Illinois corporation, Jason Whiteside, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv50317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Ezequiel Sanchez-Jimenez
as 19-3250
Defendant / Appellant:
EZEQUIEL SANCHEZ-JIMENEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
