Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Rehm et al v. Progress Software Corporation
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rehm and Matthew Oldanie
Defendant:
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION A/K/A PROGRESS, Welltok LLC, OSF Healthcare System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Fred J. de la Cotera v. Progressive Physical Therapy, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04606
Plaintiff:
Fred J. de la Cotera, D.D.S.
Defendant:
Progressive Physical Therapy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SPOT FREIGHT, INC. v. KGF TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
SPOT FREIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
KGF TRANSPORT, INC. and PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INS. CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shauna Connors v. Progressive Universal Insuranc
as 21-3190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAUNA CONNORS
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
