Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COMPTON v. YES ONLINE, INC.
as 1:2020cv01353
Plaintiff:
ROBIN COMPTON, JR.
Defendant:
YES ONLINE, INC. d/b/a Dynamic Legal Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kevin Harper v. Eric Stefonek, et al
as 19-2212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN O. HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY COMPTON, Lieutenant, CHRISTOPHER BISCHOFF, Correctional Officer, RICHARD DIAZ, Correctional Officer and others
PERALES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02268
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESERT-MOUNTAIN REGION -- BARSTOW OFFICE, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PYOD, LLC, et al v. Stacy Patrick
as 14-8028
Petitioner:
PYOD, LLC, a DE LLC and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P., a DE limited partnership
Respondent:
STACY PATRICK, formerly known as COMPTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
