Cases 91 - 100 of 157
Goodson v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00540
Plaintiff:
Gary Goodson
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Mary Miller and Gene Miller
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREE v. ETHICON, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01355
Defendant:
ETHICON INC., ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, ETHICON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA FREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lindberg et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lindberg and Carl Lindberg
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kaiser et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Barbara Kaiser and Anton Kaiser
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ridgley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Ridgley, Melissa Ridgley and Eric Ridgley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wroble et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01684
Plaintiff:
Julie Wroble and Jerry Wroble
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worrell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Doreen Worrell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv09713
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huff v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
Matthew Huff
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
