Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Danny Ruark v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
as 17-2429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY R. RUARK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
Bradley LeDure
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dortch v. K-Line Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04471
Plaintiff:
William Dortch
Defendant:
K-Line Transportation, Inc. , Keith Morris, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cross_defendant:
K-Line Transportation, Inc. and Keith Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tindall v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
Wanda Tindall
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Puffer v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2017cv01222
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Puffer
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Foust v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2017cv00489
Plaintiff:
Troy Foust
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lemberger v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv00649
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lemberger
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Spalo et al v. Safety-Kleen Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv03357
Defendant:
Safety-Kleen Corporation , Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
James Spalo and Mary Spalo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kosin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2017cv01147
Plaintiff:
Charm Kosin
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Watkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
Carl Watkins
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
