Cases 81 - 90 of 157
Rocio Herrera-Nevarez v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. SPRINGER, in his capacity as trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of ROCIO HERRERA-NEVAREZ
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Thomas Springer v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 18-1851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. SPRINGER, in his capacity as trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of ROCIO HERRERA-NEVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
GILMORE v. HOWARD et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC., THOMAS J. HOWARD and JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JANICE GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hullett et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06914
Plaintiff:
Ann M Hullett and Ronald Hullett
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon US, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beatovic, Curtis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Curtis Beatovic
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Morris
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Setser v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv05538
Plaintiff:
Henry Setser
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schomer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03133
Plaintiff:
Margaret A. Schomer
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vicari v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv04071
Plaintiff:
Tina Vicari
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herrera-Nevarez v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03930
Plaintiff:
Rocio Herrera-Nevarez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
