Cases 101 - 110 of 4,717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2023cv14905
Plaintiff:
Cordell Williams
Defendant:
James O'Brien, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Foley, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delphi v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv14864
Plaintiff:
Maurice Delphi
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Brian Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Crot et al
as 1:2023cv14805
Plaintiff:
Antwaun Robinson
Defendant:
Keith Crot, Emmanuel Villegas and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pittman v. Halloran et al
as 1:2023cv14786
Plaintiff:
Marcelous Pittman
Defendant:
John Halloran, James O'Brien, Michael Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv14686
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Evans and Fatimah M Evans
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, Unidentified Chicago Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
